

The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics
Author: Stephen Breyer
Narrator: Jim Seybert
Unabridged: 1 hr 52 min
Format: Digital Audiobook Download
Publisher: Dreamscape Media
Published: 09/14/2021
Categories: Nonfiction, Law
Author: Stephen Breyer
Narrator: Jim Seybert
Unabridged: 1 hr 52 min
Format: Digital Audiobook Download
Publisher: Dreamscape Media
Published: 09/14/2021
Categories: Nonfiction, Law
Jim Seybert has been narrating stories for nearly sixty years. He anchored radio news broadcasts from 1974 through 1992, led marketing for a nationwide group of independent bookstores, and is the PA announcer for a Collegiate League baseball team. In addition to narrating, he has published two books on leadership. He and his wife make their home in Arroyo Grande, California.
'Blazed' through the rest of this book when I heard he was retiring: very nice 'basic' theory of the connection between pragmatism and political views. Here are the problems I had with his argument: pragmatic effects and the way 'truth' is connected to such events have epistemic problems when it com......more
The Justice is candid and persuasive. As human beings we each vary in how and why we think as we do. He does not deny this but tries to argue that "politics" does not influence the decisions and actions of jurists. To me, he book proves the opposite. His points about listening, re-evaluating, compro......more
Very short which is nice and I learned a lot in an efficient way. Also nice. One of the overall takeaways for me was SCOTUS actually holds less power than I thought and Breyer makes a very strong case for why the tenuous hold on the court’s current credibility and power should be protected. From the......more
I'm a big fan of Justice Breyer but had a really tough time with his premise given recent events on the Supreme Court. How does his argument square with a sitting justice releasing one, possibly two opinions that revolve around a significant political issue prior to their official publication? How d......more
An interesting, thought-provoking topic/premise — why do we let the court decide laws, elections, etc. The way it does? Sadly Breyer fails to answer this and overall, the book is a bit to shallow in discussion (with too much narcissism; the author talks about himself often to the point of annoyance;......more